ATTENTION! We have to do a short maintenance with downtime on Tue 7 Oct 2025, 09:00 - 10:00 CEST . Please finish your work in time to prevent data loss.

27–29 Oct 2025
Europe/Rome timezone
!!! Onsite registration closed — remote registration still open! Submission is still open for posters !!!

A 3D Reconstruction of Whole-Brain Vascular immunoreactivity

27 Oct 2025, 17:30
1h 30m

Speakers

Dr Anneke Alkemade (Brain and Cognition, Psychology, University of Amsterdam) Lysanne Groenewegen (University of Amsterdam)

Description

Background and aim: The brain’s vasculature is critical for sustaining neural function and shapes in vivo neuroimaging signals such as BOLD fMRI. The microvasculature, including capillaries and arterioles, is closely tied to sites of neural activation, while macrovasculature supplies and drains broader regions. Classical ink-injection studies suffered from limited penetration into finer vessels¹,², while in vivo MRI methods remain limited in spatial resolution. To improve vascular visualization, we developed a whole-brain atlas combining post-mortem (immuno)histochemistry with high-resolution MRI. We quantified vascular scales across 31 subcortical structures, providing a reference framework for vascular architecture.

Methods: A healthy donor brain (male, 76y) was obtained through a whole-body donation program (Amsterdam UMC; Fig. 1A). After 10 % formalin perfusion fixation, quantitative MRI maps of longitudinal relaxation rate R1, transverse relaxation rate R2* and proton density were acquired at 400-μm and 200-250-μm isotropic resolution on a Magnetom 7T scanner (Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany; Leiden UMC)³,⁴. The brain was then cryoprotected in sucrose, frozen in TissueTek, and coronally sectioned into 811 slices at 200 μm using a cryomacrotome (-16 °C). Blockface images were captured for MRI alignment and histology registration (Fig. 1B). Sections were stained alternately with CD31 (PECAM- 1), SMA (Smooth Muscle Actin), and Bielschowsky Silver to visualize the vascular bed and scanned at 21-μm in-plane resolution (Fig. 1C–E). Color deconvolution was performed in Python using scikit-image’s Hematoxylin+DAB matrix (Fig. 1F), followed by vessel extraction and 3D mapping using Nighres filtering (Fig. 1G).The MASSP2.0 algorithm was applied to parcellate 31 subcortical structures on the 3D blockface reconstruction³,⁵. Labels were projected onto the aligned histology stack to identify anatomical structures (Fig. 1H). Within each MASSP2.0-defined region, vessel extractions were performed and densities quantified (Fig. 1I). Additional microscopic assessments characterized vessel morphology in SMA- and CD31-stained sections.

Results: We developed a comprehensive dataset of vessel densities across all MASSP2.0-defined structures (Fig. 1J), along with regional vessel morphology and orientation. In general, grey matter regions like the accumbens and thalamus showed denser capillary (CD31) perfusion than white matter structures, which are dominated by larger vessels (arteries). CD31 densities varied greatly across regions, ranging from 33% in the accumbens to 5% in the posterior commissure. SMA density percentages varied less, with 16% in the globus pallidus pars externa to 4% in the CA1.

Discussion: The integration of high-resolution post-mortem MRI with (immuno)histochemistry creates a framework that captures the broader anatomical context and fine-scale vascular profiles across (sub)cortical structures, addressing current gaps in vascular mapping. These data will form the basis for future studies aimed to ultimately improve interpretation of BOLD fMRI signals and account for regional vascular variability. The dataset will be made freely available upon publication of the full paper to support its use as a benchmark in future studies.

¹ Duvernoy HM et al. Brain Res Bull. 1981;7(5):519-79.
² Lauwers F et al. Neuroimage. 2008;39:936-48.
³ Alkemade A et al. Sci Adv. 2022;8(17):eabj7892.
⁴ Alkemade A et al. Front Neuroanat. 2020;14:536838.
⁵ Bazin P et al. Imaging Neurosci. 2025;doi:10.1162/imag_a_00560.

Primary author

Lysanne Groenewegen (University of Amsterdam)

Co-authors

Dr Anneke Alkemade (Brain and Cognition, Psychology, University of Amsterdam) Birte U Forstmann (Integrative Model-Based Neuroscience Research Unit, University of Amsterdam) Prof. Dick Swaab (Department of Neuropsychiatric disorders, The Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, an Institute of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Dr Evgeniya Kirilina (Department of Neurohysics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany) Dr Laura E Jonkman (Amsterdam UMC, Vrije University Amsterdam, Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences, Section Clinical Neuroanatomy and Biobanking, De Boelelaan 1118, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Amsterdam Neuroscience, programs Brain Imaging and Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Prof. Louise vd Weerd (Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands) Prof. Max Kros (Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands) Prof. Nikolaus Weiskopf (Department of Neurohysics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany, Felix Bloch Institute for Solid State Physics, Faculty of Physics and Earth Sciences, Leipzig University, Linnéstraße 5, 04103 Leipzig, Germany, Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AR, UK;) Pierre-Louis Bazin (Full Brain picture Analytics, Leiden, The Netherlands) Rawien Balesar (Department of Neuropsychiatric disorders, The Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, an Institute of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

Presentation materials