23–24 Jun 2022
Virtual
Europe/Berlin timezone

Unified Descriptions and Depictions of Network Connectivity

T-6
24 Jun 2022, 11:15
25m
Virtual

Virtual

Talk & (optional) poster Main track Talks

Speaker

Sacha J. van Albada (Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-6) and Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS-6) and JARA-Institut Brain Structure-Function Relationships (INM-10), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, Germany; Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany)

Description

Computational neuroscientists have not yet agreed on a common way to describe high-level connectivity patterns in neuronal network models. Furthermore, different studies use different symbols to represent connectivity in network diagrams. This diversity of connectivity descriptions and depictions makes it more difficult to understand and reproduce modeling results. This issue is compounded by the fact that certain aspects of the connectivity that would be necessary for its unambiguous interpretation, such as whether self-connections are allowed, are sometimes omitted from descriptions. A review of published models from the databases ModelDB [1] and Open Source Brain [2] reveals that, despite models mostly still having simple connectivity, ambiguities in their description and depiction are not uncommon. From the use of connectivity in existing models, along with a review of simulation software (e.g., NEST [3]) and specification languages (e.g., CSA [4]), we derive a set of connectivity concepts for which we propose unified terminology with precise mathematical meanings [5]. We further propose a graphical notation to represent connectivity in network diagrams. These standardized descriptions and depictions enable modelers to specify connectivity concisely and unambiguously. Moreover, the derived concepts may serve to guide the implementation and naming of high-level connection routines in simulators like NEST.

References

  1. ModelDB [https://senselab.med.yale.edu/modeldb]
    1. Gleeson P, Cantarelli M, Marin B, . . . van Albada SJ, van Geit W, R Silver RA (2019) Open Source Brain: a collaborative resource for visualizing, analyzing, simulating and developing standardized models of neurons and circuits. Neuron 3:395-411.
    2. Gewaltig M-O and Diesmann M (2007). NEST (NEural Simulation Tool). Scholarpedia. 2(4):1430, doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.1430
    3. Djurfeldt M (2012) The connection-set algebra—a novel formalism for the representation of connectivity structure in neuronal network models. Neuroinform. 10:287–304. doi:10.1007/s12021-012-9146-1
    4. Senk J, Kriener B, Djurfeldt M, Voges N, Jiang H-J, Schüttler L, Gramelsberger G, Diesmann M, Plesser HE, van Albada SJ (in press) Connectivity concepts in neuronal network modeling. PLoS Comput Biol.

Acknowledgements

This project received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation under grant agreements 785907 (HBP SGA2), 945539 (HBP SGA3), and 754304 (DEEP-EST); Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft grants 368482240/GRK2416: ‘‘RTG 2416 Multi-senses Multi-scales’’ and AL 2041/1-1 of Priority Program 2041; the Helmholtz Association Initiative and Networking Fund SO-092 (ACA); the Excellence Initiative of the German federal and state governments (neuroIC001): “ERS: disziplinärer Paketantrag NeuroIC: NeuroModelingTalk (NMT) Approaching the complexity barrier in neuroscientific modeling”; and the Helmholtz Metadata Collaboration (HMC) under grant ZT-I-PF-3-026.

Preferred form of presentation Talk & (optional) poster
Topic area models and applications
Speaker time zone UTC+2
I agree to the copyright and license terms Yes
I agree to the declaration of honor Yes

Primary authors

Sacha J. van Albada (Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-6) and Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS-6) and JARA-Institut Brain Structure-Function Relationships (INM-10), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, Germany; Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany) Birgit Kriener (Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway) Mikael Djurfeldt (PDC Center for High-Performance Computing, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden) Nicole Voges (INT UMR 7289, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France) Han-Jia Jiang (Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-6) and Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS-6) and JARA-Institut Brain Structure-Function Relationships (INM-10), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, Germany; Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany) Lisa Schüttler (Chair of Theory of Science and Technology, Human Technology Center, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany) Gabriele Gramelsberger (Chair of Theory of Science and Technology, Human Technology Center, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany) Hans E. Plesser (Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-6) and Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS-6) and JARA-Institut Brain Structure-Function Relationships (INM-10), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, Germany; Faculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway ) Markus Diesmann (Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-6) and Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS-6) and JARA-Institut Brain Structure-Function Relationships (INM-10), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, Germany; Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, School of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany; Department of Physics, Faculty 1, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany ) Johanna Senk (1 Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-6) and Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS-6) and JARA-Institut Brain Structure-Function Relationships (INM-10), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, Germany)

Presentation materials

There are no materials yet.