Evaluation Dry run #2

Do the reviewers get the larger picture or just a large amount of individual information?

When all the presentations are viewed together, are there topics and successes that we have not yet addressed?

Do the presentation not only include success stories, but are clever scientific questions addressed (science is not only about answering questions, but above all about cleverly asking new questions that advance research and transfer).

Do we manage to make it sufficiently clear what the outcome and impact of our research is (in relation to the mission of the Helmholtz Association)?

Are the national review trends in UK & USA considered?