Geo-INQUIRE Corinth Summer School 2024 - Strain mapping for the characterization and prevention of geohazard events

Survey

Corinth Summer School 2024 - Feedback Form for Students

Satisfaction

How did you like the summer school (overall satisfaction)?*

very much

a lot

not sure

a little

not at all

Was attending this summer school a valuable use of your time?*

very much

a lot

not sure

a little

not at all

Would you recommend it to colleagues or fellow students?*

very much

a lot

not sure

a little

not at all

How likely is it that you will apply for another Geo-INQUIRE summer school?*

very much

a lot

not sure

a little

not at all

How was the summer school compared to your expectations?*

Impact

My understandig of GNSS and INSAR has advanced*

very much

a lot

not sure

a little

not at all

I believe that attending the school will help me become a better scientist*

very much

a lot

not sure

a little

not at all

Attending the school will likely improve my day-to-day research productivity*

very much

a lot

not sure

a little

not at all

I will likely include some of the materials in my research*

very much

a lot

not sure

a little

not at all

Networking with students and teachers was easy and useful*

very much

a lot

not sure

a little

not at all

I believe that the summer school was useful to improve my career*

very much

a lot

not sure

a little

not at all

Organization

How did you like the organization (overall satisfaction)?*

very much

a lot

not sure

a little

not at all

How did you like the accomodation*

very much

a lot

not sure

a little

not at all

How smooth was the transportation*

very much

a lot

not sure

a little

not at all

How good was the communication*

very much

a lot

not sure

a little

not at all

Did you enjoy the social activities?*

very much

a lot

not sure

a little

not at all

The summer school was*

too short

a bit too short

just right

a bit too long

too long

How did you hear about the school?*

Geo-INQUIRE Website

Geo-INQUIRE Newsletter/Mailinglist

Website of the RIs (EPOS, etc)

Colleagues

Other

Scientific Part

How did you like the school from a scientific point of view (overall satisfaction)?

very much

a lot

not sure

a little

not at all

The number of topics was

too many

a bit too many

just right

a bit too litlle

too little

Some topics that I would have liked to hear were missing*

Yes

No

If yes, these topics are

How did you enjoy the field trip?

very much

a lot

not sure

a little

not at all

We would like to know more about the individual topics of the school. Now, please rate each session of the school (together with it's hands-on part).

Session 1: INSAR time-series analysis (Erwan & Michele, Tuesday before lunch)

Session 1: The topic was*

excellent

interesting

okay

not interesting

Session 1: The teaching material was*

excellent

good

okay

not suitable

Session 1: The teachers were*

excellent

good

okay

not suitable

Session 1: I learned*

very much

a lot

a little

nothing at all

Session 2: GNSS time-series analysis (Anne, Tuesday after lunch)

Session 2: The topic was*

excellent

interesting

okay

not interesting

Session 2: The teaching material was*

excellent

good

okay

not suitable

Session 2: The teacher was*

excellent

good

okay

not suitable

Session 2: I learned*

very much

a lot

a little

nothing at all

Session 3: GNSS time-series analysis (high-rate) (Mathilde & Antonio, Wednesday early morning)

Session 3: The topic was*

excellent

interesting

okay

not interesting

Session 3: The teaching material was*

excellent

good

okay

not suitable

Session 3: The teachers were*

excellent

good

okay

not suitable

Session 3: I learned*

very much

a lot

a little

nothing at all

Session 4: Inversion for fault models, slip rates, fault locking (Simone, Wednesday before lunch)

Session 4: The topic was*

excellent

interesting

okay

not interesting

Session 4: The teaching material was*

excellent

good

okay

not suitable

Session 4: The teacher was*

excellent

good

okay

not suitable

Session 4: I learned*

very much

a lot

a little

nothing at all

Session 5: Strain rate computation (Guiseppe & Demitris, Thursday early morning)

Session 5: The topic was*

excellent

interesting

okay

not interesting

Session 5: The teaching material was*

excellent

good

okay

not suitable

Session 5: The teachers were*

excellent

good

okay

not suitable

Session 5: I learned*

very much

a lot

a little

nothing at all

Session 6: Seismotectonics -Transnational Access at the CRL-NFO (Roberto, Panagiotis, Wednesday after lunch, no hands-on)

Session 6: The topic was*

excellent

interesting

okay

not interesting

Session 6: The teaching material was*

excellent

good

okay

not suitable

Session 6: The teachers were*

excellent

good

okay

not suitable

Session 6: I learned*

very much

a lot

a little

nothing at all

Session 9: strain rate for seismic hazard evaluation (Marianne & Anne, Thursday before lunch, no hands-on)

Session 9: The topic was*

excellent

interesting

okay

not interesting

Session 9: The teaching material was*

excellent

good

okay

not suitable

Session 9: The teachers were*

excellent

good

okay

not suitable

Session 9: I learned*

very much

a lot

a little

nothing at all

Knowledge Gain - Small test

In which direction the INSAR data are the most sensitive?*

N-S

W-.E

up-down

High-resolution GNSS can record P-waves.*

Yes

No

Which data are better for science (are easier to find and use)?*

Open Data

FAIR Data

Which methodology is better for earthquakes hazard analyses?*

probabilistic

deterministic

it depends

Comments

What are your key takeaways from this event?

What are the things that could have been better? What should be changed?

Any general recommendations?

Back

Your answers will be submitted anonymously.